Volume 1 Issue
6
June 25, 2004
Sulfur Deficiency in Alfalfa?
Several alfalfa fields in the central Red
River Valley have shown signs of yellowing which may be sulfur
deficiency. Alfalfa and canola tend to respond most to sulfur
fertilization more than other crops in our area. Sulfur deficiency
tends to resemble nitrogen deficiency, except that it shows up on
the newer tissue first, whereas nitrogen deficiency will usually be
seen on the older tissue before spreading to the newer tissue as the
deficiency becomes more severe.
Plants absorb sulfur in the SO4= (sulfate ion) form. Sulfur is a
part of several amino acids and is, therefore, a component of most
proteins. Plants can continue to absorb sulfate in excess of plant
requirements, as long as it continues to be available in the soil.
However, plants cannot translocate extra sulfate to younger tissue
if the soil levels become too low.
In my opinion, sulfur is one of the more neglected macronutrients
in alfalfa production. In our area sulfur is needed in alfalfa in
amounts second only to canola, and if you haven’t included sulfur in
your fertilizer program for several years, you may benefit by adding
it to your next application program. As crop production has greatly
increased over the past few decades, it appears that the application
of sulfur, as with some of the micronutrients, has not kept up.
There is a great deal of difference between sulfur needs and an
increase in production from added sulfur. Consider for a moment that
sulfur deficiency most often shows up on sandy soils (leaching of
sulfur), and low organic matter soils (reduced mineralization).
Consider also that much sulfur, as well as nitrogen and phosphorus,
is added to the soil through organic matter decomposition, and thus
liberates these minerals for the crop. This decomposition process is
driven by soil organisms, which in turn are partly controlled by the
moisture and temperature of the soil.
Conclusions? An answer might be that the rate of mineralization
(liberation of S) could be much slower than normal due to our
unseasonably moist, cool conditions. Even though in past years your
alfalfa crop may not have shown what may be sulfur deficiency, you
may benefit from a little added sulfur. Many of our soils in the Red
River Valley are high to very high in organic matter. High organic
matter and good moisture and temperature can translate to higher
mineralization of sulfur for the crop. However, higher rates of
mineralization may add only adequate sulfur and not enough to give
you greater production. I would also like to note that soil tests
for sulfur are questionable at best, partly due to their failure to
estimate mineralization of S throughout the season.
Soil sulfur levels are considered low if you have less than 10-12
lbs/A; medium if you have 15 - 20 lbs/A; and high if it is greater
than 25 lbs/A. However, some crops (canola) have been shown to
economically increase yields with as much as 40 lbs/A sulfur. Added
sulfur should come from a soluble sulfate source such as ammonium
sulfate (24 % sulfur). Elemental sulfur (30-99% sulfur) has been
shown to perform poorly in our soils.
Bobby Holder—UMC Soil Scientist
|